History of the High Court
Beginnings
Although the High Court of Australia was
established in 1901 by Section 71 of the Constitution, the appointment of the
first Bench had to await the passage of the Judiciary Act in 1903.
The first sitting of the High Court took place in
the Banco Court of the Supreme Court building in Melbourne on 6 October 1903. It
was a distinguished Bench, comprising three people who had been prominent in the
Federal movement. They were:
- The Chief Justice, Sir Samuel Griffith, former
Premier and former Chief Justice of Queensland.
- Sir Edmund Barton, the first Prime Minister of
Australia and Leader of the Constitutional Conventions which led to
Australia becoming a Federation in 1901.
- Richard Edward O'Connor, a former Minister of
Justice and Solicitor-General of New South Wales and the first Leader of the
Government in the Senate.
There was an opinion held by many at the time
that the High Court would prove to be a redundant tribunal, with little work to
do and no real status. However, the initial Bench quickly set about proving
wrong these prophecies. From their first judgments, the Justices stamped the
authority of the High Court over the State Supreme Courts and showed that the
Court was a powerful and necessary arm of the newly-created Commonwealth of
Australia. Using their own construct of the Constitution and the Judiciary Act,
they took upon themselves a wide appellate jurisdiction, thereby increasing
significantly the workload of the Court.
The Court quickly gained an international
reputation for judicial excellence. Such was its success that the workload
quickly became too much for three Justices. In 1906, the Justices made
representations to parliament for an increase in their number. Later that same
year, two more Justices were appointed - Sir Isaac Isaacs and Henry Bournes
Higgins.
In November 1912 Justice O'Connor died in office.
At the same time, the workload of the High Court had grown to the extent that it
was stretching the capacity of five Justices, so Parliament agreed to again
increase the Bench by two. In February 1913 Frank Gavan Duffy was appointed to
replace Justice O'Connor, and the following month Charles Powers and Albert
Bathurst Piddington were appointed to increase the High Court Bench to seven
Justices.
Gavan Duffy's appointment was warmly welcomed by
the legal profession but there was considerable disquiet about the appointment
of Justices Powers and Piddington. Criticism centred around their abilities as
lawyers: the Bars of New South Wales and Victoria even went so far as to
withhold the customary congratulations on their appointment.
Justice Powers ignored the criticism and remained
on the High Court Bench until 1929. Justice Piddington, however, resigned on 5
April 1913 without taking his seat on the Bench.
The Great Depression and World War II
In 1929 the Great Depression gripped the world.
In July of that year Justice Powers retired, but the vacancy was not immediately
filled. Then, in March 1930 Chief Justice Knox retired. Sir Isaac Isaacs was
promoted to the position of Chief Justice, leaving a Bench of just five. The
Great Depression had caused the workload of the High Court to decrease, and
consequently there was a view in some areas of government that, in the interests
of economy, the two vacancies on the High Court Bench should not be filled.
In December 1930, however, the Labor Government
filled both vacancies. Doctor Herbert Vere Evatt was the first appointee. At age
36, he was, and remains to this day, the youngest person ever appointed a
Justice of the High Court. The second appointee was Edward Aloysius McTiernan,
who also set a record: he served on the Bench for almost 46 years, retiring in
September 1976 at the age of 84.
In January 1931 Chief Justice Isaacs retired to
take up his appointment as Governor-General. Sir Frank Gavan Duffy was promoted
to Chief Justice but, due to the financial stringencies of the Great Depression,
no appointment was made to restore the Bench to seven Justices. In 1933
Parliament amended the Judiciary Act which formalised the reduction in the number
of Justices from seven to six. It wasn't until 1946 that, with the Great
Depression and World War II over, the legislation was amended to restore the
number of Justices to seven. The reasons given by the Government for the
restoration were that the workload of the Court had increased and that the
number of equally divided decisions was causing problems. Thus, in May 1946, Sir
William Flood Webb was appointed to the Court. The Bench has remained at seven
Justices ever since.
During World War II the High Court was called
upon to determine many issues related to the extent of the Commonwealth's
defence powers as prescribed in the Constitution. The results generally widened
the Commonwealth's powers, in time of war or immediate threat of war, at the
expense of the States. The situation was found to be different, however, during
peace-time. In the famous "Communist Party Case" of 1951, for
instance, the Court ruled invalid an attempt by the Parliament to invoke its
defence powers (in light of the Korean conflict then in progress) to declare the
Australian Communist Party an unlawful association.
Developments in Later Years
During the 1960's the appellate and original
jurisdiction work of the High Court had grown to burdensome proportions. Sir
Garfield Barwick, both as a Minister in federal Parliament (1958-1964) and as
Chief Justice of the High Court (from 1964), proposed a new federal superior
court to free the High Court from much of this work. The proposal grew in
strength in subsequent years and, in 1976, legislation was passed establishing
the Federal Court of Australia.
Appeals to the Privy Council from decisions of
the High Court were effectively ended by the combined effects of the Privy
Council (Limitation of Appeals) Act 1968 and the Privy Council (Appeals from the
High Court) Act 1975. However, a right of appeal to the Privy Council remained
from State courts, in matters governed by State law, until the passage of the
Australia Acts, both State and Federal, in the 1980s.
In 1977 the Constitution Alteration (Retirement
of Judges) Act was proclaimed, ending the life tenure of High Court Justices.
The Act required that all Justices appointed from then on must retire on
attaining the age of 70 years.
In 1979 the High Court was given the power to
administer its own affairs by the passage of the High Court of Australia Act
1979. This Act, which was proclaimed on 21 April 1980, prescribes:
- the qualifications for, and method of
appointment of, the Justices;
- the administration of the Court's affairs
under the Act, including the appointment, functions and powers of certain
Court officers;
- High Court Registry and procedure;
- methods of funding and control of the Court's
finances; and
- reporting and accountability arrangements.
Accommodation
In its early years, the High Court shared
courtroom and registry facilities with State courts in Sydney and Melbourne.
Separate facilities were eventually provided for the High Court in Sydney in
1923. In Melbourne, a special building for the Court was constructed and opened
in 1928. The Principal Registry of the High Court was located in these Melbourne
premises until 1973, when it was transferred to Sydney.
A national competition for the design of a
permanent home, in Canberra, for the High Court took place in 1972-73.
Construction of the building began in 1975 and it was opened by Her Majesty the
Queen on 26 May 1980. The Court and its Principal Registry were immediately
transferred to the new building and the first sitting in this location took
place in June 1980.
NOTE: more information on the
High Court building may be found at The
High Court Building
Sitting Practice
Today, most sittings take place in Canberra.
Sittings are also scheduled in Sydney and Melbourne, usually on one day per
month on an alternating basis. In addition, the Court continues the practice,
established on its inauguration in 1903, of sitting in the capital cities of
Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Tasmania once each year if
there is sufficient business to warrant it.
Since 1989, the High Court has occasionally heard
applications for special leave to appeal by video link with Brisbane, Adelaide
and Perth. This method of hearing, which is designed to save litigants the cost
of flying their counsel to Canberra, is becoming more and more popular.
Further Reading
For those interested in reading more about the
history of the High Court and its impact on Australian law, a selected list of
books on those subjects is given below.
Bennett J.M, Keystone of the Federal Arch
(Canberra 1980): AGPS
Blackshield, Tony, Coper, Michael and Williams, George (eds), The
Oxford Companion to the High Court of Australia (Melbourne, 2001) Oxford
University Press
Coper, Michael, Encounters with the Australian
Constitution (North Ryde 1987): CCH
Deakin, Alfred, The Federal Story (Melbourne
1944): Melbourne University Press
Dixon, Sir Owen, Jesting Pilate (Melbourne 1965):
Law Book Company
Else-Mitchell, Mr Justice, Essays on the
Australian Constitution (Sydney 1961): Law Book Company
Galligan, Brian, Politics of the High Court (St
Lucia 1987): University of Queensland Press
Howard, Colin, The Constitution, Power and
Politics (Melbourne 1980): Fontana
Hull, Crispin, The High Court of Australia: Celebrating the Centenary
1903-2003 (Sydney, 2003) Thomson
La Nauze, J.A, The Making of the Australian
Constitution (Melbourne 1972): Melbourne University Press
Lee, H. P. and Winterton, George (eds), Australian
Constitutional Landmarks (Cambridge, 2003). University Press
Menzies, Sir Robert, Central Power in the
Australian Commonwealth (2nd edn, Melbourne 1968): Cassell Australia Ltd
Sawer, Geoffrey, Australian Federal Politics and
Law 1901-1929 (Carlton 1972): Melbourne University Press
Sawer, Geoffrey, Australian Federal Politics and
Law 1929-1949 (Carlton 1974): Melbourne University Press
Solomon, David, The Political Impact of the High
Court (Sydney 1992): Allen & Unwin
Zines, L. ed, The High Court and the Constitution
(4th edn 1997): Butterworths